Re: Nate

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Hawke wrote:

>Also, I do *not* threaten, I've outgrown it.
>please, _everyone_, verify before uttering.
>please!

in response to my

>>For God's sake, it was you who originally
>>threatened the bastard with a legal action!

I said, quite clearly, 'originally'!

Let me quote from your 10 Sep 1998 message, you talked directly to
Nate:

>Your parents are your legal guardians, and as
>such, they are responsible for your actions.  If anyone was
>to bring charges against you for this verbal abuse (the f' word)
>they would be the ones arrested, charged and made to stand trial.
>*Do* *you* *want* *that?*

(Sorry, *my* emphasis in the last line!)
If I were a cynic, I would say you have done quite a bit of growing up
in the last few weeks, in fact I would not hesitate to call it a
complete, beautiful metamorphosis. Or was it the desecration of the
American flag that got you going that time?

But that's not fair, and I should not say that, but I simply could not
resist it. And yes, I lost some data, but nothing tragic, and Rob is
right, Nate's parents are probably scared enough to deal with the
little snot.

And thanks for your little poem, Hawke, I shall treasure it. jiri

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu