OpenEuphoria

Re: Translated w/ 2.4 CRASH

• Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Jun 27, 2003
• 378 views

kbochert at copper.net wrote:
> Do you have the source? You might try
> increasing the extra bytes allocated for  sequences.
> When I saw the same slowdown  on Bach, I discovered that adding 
> 32 bytes to the allocation solved the problem.
> I have no idea why!
> It may just move the slowdown to a higher threshold.
> I have had no problems, but I don't generally do large
> allocations.
> I think I can post the fix in the form of:
>    file:function -- change x to y.
> But I will first give Rob a chance to object or comment.

That's ok with me. Post your fix.
I assume you mean the parameters that control
how much extra space is reserved when a sequence
is appended-to. Increasing that value could speed up certain
code by quite a bit, while wasting some memory
in other situations.

Regards,
    Rob Craig
    Rapid Deployment Software
    http://www.RapidEuphoria.com