OpenEuphoria

Re: Use of Source Forge for win32lib

• Posted by Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum_analyst at hotmail.com> Jun 23, 2003
• 410 views

I only meant deleting the old CVS stuff. The downloads can stay the same. 
That was the one of the points of SF, to save all releases you have.

>From: Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: Use of Source Forge for win32lib
>
>
>On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:23:44 -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade
><quantum_analyst at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You might want to delete those old files though.
> > I could do that too; I'd need developer access, though.
>
>Erm, not sure that is a good idea.
>
>Earlier today I posted a test program showing some clicks and a lost
>focus problem.
>
>I had already tried that with a previous version of win32lib (0.55.1)
>already on my machine, when I saw your post I decided to try it with
>some of the even older ones I had noticed there: the clicks are still
>there but the focus is OK in 0.54 (just downloaded from sourceforge),
>so at least I've narrowed my search down a bit...
>
>Alright, there are limits, and I'm not suggesting anyone waste time
>uploading old rubbish to sourceforge, but you can be too fussy about
>keeping the place clean. Plus, I think you get about sixty versions
>of win32lib for one version of, say, Parrot.
>
>Pete