RE: Desktop pic proggy....
- Posted by Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum_analyst at hotmail.com> Jun 18, 2003
- 451 views
>From: Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> >Subject: RE: Desktop pic proggy.... > > >Tone =8Akoda wrote: > > > > > > You can make you own, using: > > > > success =3D w32Func (xSystemParametersInfo, {SPI_SETDESKWALLPAPER, > > 0, dest_fname, 0}) > > > > and use FreeLib to convert jpg to bmp. > > > > Then you could set Windows scheduler to execute this program every hour. > > > > I wrote a program which sets desktop wallpaper from jpg image and > > writes= > > =20 > > today's date onto image. > > > > > > mistertrik at hotmail.com wrote: > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Can anyone recommend a simple desktop wallpaper program? > > > I'd like to be able to point it at a directory full of pics and have >it= > > =20 > > > auto-change ever few hours or so.... > > >=20 > > > *Free > > > *No spyware > > >=20 > > > >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > > > > > >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > .______<-------------------\__ > > > / _____<--------------------__|=3D=3D=3D > > > ||_ <-------------------/ > > > \__| Mr Trick > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > >Hi there Tone, > >You can use my Jpg decoder too, as this makes another file from >your Jpg file (i think it was named Als_DJ.exe) and it's a small >exe file. > >I'm finding the GD lib to be faster when you want to display a >jpg though, but the darn lib is over 700k. Im thinking of >building a smaller version that only does decoding perhaps. That's because Windows does not include all the wonderful libraries the world of *nix has. In fact, the FreeType library takes up almost half of the DLL (359 K). LibPNG is 167K, JpegLib is 137K, and Zlib takes up a whopping 63K. The actual GD part is only 202K. All compiled together, it gets lumped into a DLL of 711K. I believe I put a small note (perhaps too small) in there that if you wanted a smaller version, I could compile it for you. >Take care for now, >Al -=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Does anyone really get my e-mails? If yes, please do not respond.....