Re: Thanks
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Jun 18, 2003
- 512 views
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:09:09 -0400, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote: >That makes sense with cooperative multitasking. Preemptive multitasking >doesn't really need this however. You may well be right >why do more modern Windoze OSes need it? now there's an oxymoron ;-0 Pete
