Re: Sequence-Atom-DLL
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Jun 03, 2003
- 410 views
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:11:12 -0500, C. K. Lester <cklester at yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> I expect that the vast majority of people will >> want to call Euphoria .dll's from Euphoria programs. > > Why make anything a .DLL? I'm guessing there's a speed-up in execution of > the code? Is that the only benefit... speed? > I believe that Windows only loads one copy of the DLL into RAM, regardless of how many processes are using it. It removes it from RAM when the last process that opened it has ended. This is why DLL is very suitable for routines that are likely to be shared by many applications. -- cheers, Derek Parnell