Re: Why 'for', not 'from' ?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Hello Al:

> --compare:
> 
> for our container that is going to hold 1 to 10 different objects
> --sounds ok
> 
> from our container that is going to hold 1 to 10 different objects
> --sounds like we are going to take something out of it.

Why out?

See please:

A--------------------B

A is start point of the loop's parameter.
B is finish point of the loop's parameter.

Parameter goes "from the A point to the B point".
Is "out A to B" good in English for the line above ???

[snip]

> Then again, the 'for' loop takes up two less 
> bytes per loop 
> instance; what do you have to say about that?  smile

Any key word inside EU interpreter is just 1 byte.
In Russian, "FROM" = "OT" or "IZ", "OUT" = "IZ", 
but "FOR" = "DLYA"  blink

Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu