Re: Spell checker optimization
- Posted by Joe Phillips <bubba at TXWES.EDU> Mar 25, 1998
- 825 views
At 11:00 AM 3/25/98 -0600, you wrote: >Well, I'm not sure I agree with Mr. Nieuwenhuijsen's idea of the >binary tree implementation, but I'll give him a chance to explain >it more fully before I say it's not a better way of doing it. Thanks for the detailed explanations. Although I knew the concepts, the presentation was succinct and thorough. In fact, it was those explanations that leads me to think a Binary Tree might be the best for this implementation. Besides, what good is a dictionary to which you cannot add words? I think the b2-tree (balanced binary tree) concept works beautifully. In fact, the file can be stored as a b2-tree (with pointers) so as to not have to rebuild the tree at each load. Although, I often use binary searches for the very reasons mentioned. (EASY) In fact, many times I will even use binary searches in un-sorted, linked lists or files. Although I have to parse through pointers, key comparisons are kept at a minimum. --[ Joe Phillips, Sytems Analyst --[ Texas Wesleyan University 817-531-4444 --[ --[ "The tongue of the just is as choice silver: --[ the heart of the wicked is little worth." Proverbs 10:20