Re: nix config next steps

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Matt Lewis wrote:
> Bernie Ryan wrote:
> > CChris wrote:
> > > 
> > > Why not bindeu, shroudeu and backendeu?
> > > They don't sound too unfamiliar and are less likely to clash with anything
> > > else.
> > > 
> > 
> > It would make more sense to call them:
> > 
> > bind.eu, shroud.eu and backend.eu
> > 
> 
> One issue with that scheme is that they look like include files, which they
> aren't.
> 
> I kinda like:
> 
>   eubind eushroud eubackend

Sounds good to me.

euphoria/bin/ed also conflicts with the name of 
the ancient Unix ed editor.

It will be great if we can get Euphoria accepted
into a popular Linux distribution. Thanks for your efforts!

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu