Re: nix config next steps

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Matt Lewis wrote:
> 
> Is there anyone interested in starting the man page?  I'd say that we 
> probably want to make a single page to cover exu/ecu/backendu/bind/shroud.*

Would there be any problem with using the Euphoria documentation as is?
For example:
man exu would get the Euphoria Reference Manual.
man ecu would get the Euphoria to C Translator Manual.


> *  Are names like backendu, bind and shroud too generic?  Assuming that the
> ultimate goal is to get accepted into Linux distributions, do these conflict
> with anything already out there?  Should we change them?  If so, to what?

If you don't change the names now, then after some years there will be more
resistance to changing the names. Easier now.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu