Re: is this ex.err bug?
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Jan 31, 2005
- 438 views
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:50:20 -0800, Robert Craig <guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote: >One could argue that I shouldn't report >a for-loop variable at all in ex.err if the loop has terminated, >but I think the extra information might be useful to someone, >although a bit confusing. OK, I'll argue for it I think if a newbie sees rowIndex[1]=10 but rowIndex[2]=5, they'll know the second loop has exited prematurely, so their natural reaction will be to code: end for if rowIndex!=10 then -- loop abandoned? Of course the best thing would be to show eg: [rowIndex = 10] [rowIndex = 5] rowIndex = 3 Regards, Pete