OpenEuphoria

Re: ARWEN users - Edita alpha released

• Posted by Tone Škoda <tskoda at email.si> Jan 25, 2005
• 529 views

for editor i think it's important it has as many features as possible so that
different users can find all the different things they want in it. i wont use an
editor if it's missing one feature i am used to use from my previous editor. it's
hard to let go old habbits.
and of course that it is easy to use, that it is nice to user.

the more features an editor has the better.

What I would really like is WINDOWS DEBUGGER built into a nice features-rich
editor!!!

i have done explorer treeview (directory browser) in my picview in archives, but
its for win32lib.


i get this error on start:

C:\Documents and Settings\tskoda\Desktop\Z003\edita\easynld.e:455
type_check failure, dirlist is -1
--> see ex.err



Pete Lomax wrote:
> 
> 
> I've been writing a new editor using arwen (included).
> 
> The first public showing is now available:
> 
> <a
> href="http://palacebuilders.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/euphoria.html">http://palacebuilders.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/euphoria.html</a>
> 
> Alpha version. No file save. No delete, return, undo/redo...
> 
> I am concentrating on the GUI part & syntax highlighting and
> would appreciate feedback concentrated on that aspect.
> 
> Thanks to ARWEN, performance is astonishing:
> 
> 		load win32lib	cursor to line 300	page down to end of file
> MEditor		13 secs			1 min 40 (!!)		3 mins 14 secs
> Crimson		18 secs			  44 secs			3 mins 13 secs
> CodeGenie	 2 secs			   8 secs			1 min 30 secs
> Edita		 2 secs			   8 secs			13 secs
> 
> What is important to people?
> A pretty icon toolbar?
> An explorer treeview?
> A project manager?
> SCCS-style source control system?
> Capturing DOS output in an editor pane?
> A layout designer (as opposed to a complete IDE)?
> 
> Proof-of-concept programs for any of the above might help!
> 
> Regards,
> Pete
> 
>