Re: What's wrong with Euphoria??? Newbie perspective...
Ferlin Scarborough wrote:
> <Ferlin Mounts Soap Box>
>
> Sounds to me like you are driving a Cadilac and want to Upgrade to a
> Lamborgini
> for FREE.
To me it sounded that he prefers BMW. I personally would not object
against Porsche. For free, of course. 
SCNR
<snip>
> If you want a real programming language that is simple to use you end up
> paying
> 100's or 1000's of dollars for it. Most of them have a trial version or
> educational
> version, but they will not create an executable, you have to purchase the full
> version to get that functionality.
>
> Euphoria is CHEAP*CHEAP*CHEAP compared to other languages.
Yep.
> As for the adding of Environment Variables, Euphoria used to do that for you,
> but a lot of the PAYING users, did not like the idea of an installation
> program
> changing their customized environment, so RDS accomdated them by removing that
> from the installation.
IIRC, it was not the suggestion to remove that opportunity completely
from the installer, but to let the user choose whether or not s/he wants
the installer to change anything on their system. But (again IIRC) the
2.5 beta installer does *not* provide such a choice.
> If you can not figure out a simple thing like adding evironment variables,
> with
> the instructions included with Euphoria, then you most likely will not be able
> to figure out programming.
TRUE*TRUE*TRUE
> <Ferlin steps off the soap box>
Regards,
Juergen
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
