Re: Patching distributed EXE's
- Posted by Euman <euman at BELLSOUTH.NET> Jan 24, 2001
- 565 views
Better read: How to Create a VIRUS - BOOK 1 - PART 1. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Ekl=F6f" <darkspace at SUNPOINT.NET> To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 17:36 Subject: Re: Patching distributed EXE's > > I don't see how sending out a new .exe is so complex. You make the > > fix and > > tell everybody it's available for download at > > www.such-n-such-website.com... > > I think he's worried more about size than complexity. If the EXE is something around 500KB, why make modem users download the whole shebang w= hen they could just, eg. get a 5KB patch. > I think "diff" would be a good bet in the Un*x-world. Any tools like it for Windows? If not, well, get to work already :) > > > >> I know I can modify the binary, but I don't like that idea. Not > > that I > >> have any particular need for it now, but in the future, if I want to > >> distribute an exe, and by chance it contains an error. I would like > > to be > >> able to fix it without the user having to download the entire file > > again, > >> or something of similar size. I'm wondering if there's a way to > > re-include > >> a source file that contains the bug fix without having to recompile > > the > >> exe. Or will the patch just end up being too big? Would I have to > > include > >> the compiler to do so? > > > On a side note, I wonder if our little friend "Mike the Spike" has a borderline disorder? Looks like it from here. Childhood trauma resulting = in incomplete personality integration? Schitzotypal personality, even? > > > > > Weekend psychologist, > esoteric programmer extraordinaire > --Tom "Rama Rama Ding Ding" Ekl=F6f > > DO COME FROM (2) > (2) PLEASE DON'T PANIC > > > > Tiesitk=F6, ett=E4 Sunpoint.netin k=E4ytt=E4j=E4t voivat lukea s=E4hk=F6= postinsa my=F6s WAP-puhelimella. > p%3A%2F%2 Fwww.sunpoint.net%2Fwap%2F >