RE: more match() problems
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> May 28, 2003
- 407 views
Derek Parnell wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 May 2003 07:43:20 +0000, Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello again, > > > > Looking closer at the match() function, > > i find that it doesnt really work very well > > unless you are only using it on one level sequences (like {1,2,3} or > > "abc"). > > > > Untill this point, i dont think i ever used it > > for anything else, but since we were looking at it > > anyway i thought i would mention this. > > > > match({2,3},{1,2,3}) > > > > returns the number 2, because the 'slice' was found > > in the second sequence. Works fine. > > > > Now, > > > > match({{1,2,3}},{{1,2,3}}) > > > > returns the number 1, because again the 'slice' (although this time > > deeper) was found in > > the second sequence. Works fine. > > > > Nowwwwwwwww... > > > > what does > > > > match({{2,3}},{{1,2,3}}) > > > > return? (same example with the 1 missing in first arg) > > > > If you said the number 2, you are correct, because > > the 'slice' could be found in the second sequence > > at the required level, right??? > > > > Well, guess again! > > The Eu match command returns a big fat zero! > > > > Yes, that's right, > > > > i=match({{1,2,3}},{{1,2,3}}) -- rets 1 > > but > > i=match({{2,3}},{{1,2,3}}) -- rets 0 > > > > > > Care to try to figure that out? > > Sure. Let's look at all the possible slices of {{1,2,3}}, shall we. > > s = {{1,2,3}} > Length of s is 1, right? > So then there is only one slice, namely s[1..1] and its value is > {{1,2,3}}. > > Now the LHS side of your match was {{2,3}}. Can you locate this value in > > any of the slices (all one of them) of s? > > > > I guess i went too far in assuming there was a method > > to the madness. > > > > Anomaly number 97316 and counting... > > Not an anomaly at all. I keep saying this but it doesn't seem to be > making > it across the language barrier... > > match() LOOKS FOR SLICES - ALWAYS. > find() LOOKS FOR ELEMENTS - ALWAYS. > > > -- > > cheers, > Derek Parnell > Yeah? no kiddin??? I realized i made the same mistake Kat made, but the post went through already, and there is no way to edit a post like there is in other message boards i post on. Once you hit that button, that's it. It's a shame it solicited a response, because that response was a wasted effort. Thanks anyway, Al