Re: Mini Assembler ATTEN: ROB
- Posted by xerox_irs at lvcm.com
May 20, 2003
my email don't working good now, um this might take a while to get there,
and may get there before the one i already sent.
the problem was, it uses mmx instructions, then does't use emms or femms to
set it back to fpu instructions, because then next in the code is an if
statement with an atom(ie a double) that uses fpu instructions and made an
execption and a cw error, once a put an femms/emms in there it did it no
more, so the only difference between 2.3, and 2.4b was that the atom was a
double and not an integer which is way it worked with 2.3, but not 2.4b.
Daniel Kluss
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Craig" <rds at RapidEuphoria.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: Mini Assembler ATTEN: ROB
>
>
> Bernie Ryan wrote:
> > Daniel:
> >
> > I looked at the Euphoria source code for
> > the the builtin function call()
> > and the source code has been changed from version 2.3 to 2.4 which
> > may be causing the causeway crash.
> > Rob will have to look at the code for the because he understand better
> > what is going on.
>
> The wording of one comment was changed.
>
> call() works fine for me in 2.4 beta.
>
> Regards,
> Rob Craig
> Rapid Deployment Software
> http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
