Re: Artificial what?

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On 15 May 2003, at 19:22, Christian.CUVIER at agriculture.gouv.fr wrote:

> 
> > Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 09:23:18 -0500
> > From: "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: Artificial What?
> > 
> 
> {snip]
> 
> 
> > I don't plan to preplan a life. I propose to create a sentient being with
> > all
> > the capacities of sense and memory and learning and physical functioning,
> > then
> > set it loose and raise it and see what happens.
> > 
>  Yhis is the point. You can profoundly affect the future behaviour of an 
> human being through the way you (don't) "raise it". Life preplanning is 
> common across all human groups ever known. Not interferring at all is an 
> extreme way to raise an entity, generally leading to the most ruthless 
> species.

Or the most misguided, as the offspring mimic the parents. I hear "i was 
raised that way" as an excuse for the more idiotic behavior. It's all about 
programming, and i don't mean with the computers. For instance, the usa 
criticized the ussr for brainwashing children, making them chant pro-soviet 
rhetoric in elementary schools. The usa didn't do that, of course, they made 
the kids say the "pledge of allegiance", as if the kids knew 1/2 the words 
they were pledging. Religion is frequently an avenue for exploitation and 
control of humanity's minds, and i fervently hope Ai is smart enough to forego 
that.

Kat

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu