Re: Artificial What?
- Posted by Jason Dube <dubetyrant at hotmail.com> May 15, 2003
- 517 views
>From: "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com> >Subject: Artificial What? > > >I just realized how to better verbalize my approach to AI... listen up all >you AI enthusiasts out there... > >You cannot separate True Intelligence(tm) from sentience. And you must >develop sentience first!!! The whole AI industry is trying to develop an >AI= > >entity backwards by doing the intelligence first, when what we need is, >first, a sentient being. > >Here's dictionary.com's definition of intelligence: > >in=B7tel=B7li=B7gence ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-tl-jns) >n. > 1. The capacity to acquire and apply knowledge. > >The "capacity to acquire..." You cannot acquire what you cannot perceive. > >dictionary.com defines sentient thusly: > >sen=B7tient adj. > 1.. Having sense perception; conscious > 2.. Experiencing sensation or feeling. > -A computer program can aquire data easily -A computer program be aware of its own data and it can be programmed to know that other data exists > >What does this further have to say about AI? > >Well, developing AI in a computer is going to be interesting. When >programming this AI brain, you can't count on any of the standard senses, >except maybe vision and hearing. We can't do touch. We can't do smell. >Vision can be done via a camera, and hearing via a microphone. The >computer= > >can "sense" what I call a "digital data stream." Humans can't (yet). -It wouldnt need to smell,taste or feel, all it would do is push pixels and process data.And thats enough of a task I'll wager. > >Then there's the simulation approach... but that is WAY TOO INTENSIVE. >Simulating reality is much more difficult than actually putting the AI >entity into reality and letting it sense reality. I won't even go there >for= > >now. Reality is already there... why not use it? :) -Have you ever had a discussion with someone, and though you seemed to be disagreeing, you really were just rephrasing the other's arguments? Thas how I classify most ai discussions. > >The hardest thing to give is motivation. How do you motivate the entity? >You've got to give it a reason. The reason we're alive? To experience joy. >That's it. God made us so that we could enjoy a relationship with Him and >with His creation. How will you motivate a sentient entity of your own >making to be nice? to survive (if at all)? Just program it to be motivated, give it states, timers and a series of conditions that must be satisfied. > >So, develop something that can receive input, give it "instincts" (basic, >but overridable (as it learns), actions to various stimuli) and let it >go..= > > >-- >Regards, > Rob Craig > Rapid Deployment Software > http://www.RapidEuphoria.com -Gee I wish I could really hear Rob C's take on ai. But I dont see much diversion from eu topics with him.Maybe he is a machine himself? Maybe just some ai? No, just kidding > > > > > > > > >TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!