Stuff...

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

[The new mailing lists]

        IMHO, not a good idea.  Please read the archives for the countless =
reasons why.  I shan't waste space by repeating them all.  I think it's =
good you have the means and desire to practice managing such a beast, =
but a different topic might be a better idea!

[Gnuphoria]

Sayonara, and may your journey to the great software beyond be pleasant
        =
8-P

[Dave]

        Now that you have so much free time <G>, any hope for improvements to =
Win32Lib?

[Win32Help]

I haven't had a chance to fill in any of the suggestion to MS Help, but
        =
they look good.  Anyone have the filespecs for .HLP?

[Bitblt]

        When doing graphics/animation, I've found myself nostalgic for the =
PutPixel and DisplayImage routines of Pascal, which allowed relatively =
fast access to logical operators on bitmaps.  Maybe I'm not looking in =
the right places, but are there any FAST routines out there that allow =
me to display an image XOR'd with the current screen.  I could program =
it myself, but only in a slow version -- not good for my needs.

[A dilemna]

        I've tried separating my dialogs into different include files.  I want =
all similar operators together so I can reuse these pieces.  However, =
doing this brings me to a C-type dilemna.  I have 2 files that call each =
other interdependantly.  Regardless of which order I include them, I get =
a "variable not declared" error.  All variables are declared as global =
and there are no conflicting names.  I can pull out all these errant =
variables into a "header" file (yew, I smell 'C'), or I can leave =
everything in one huge monster file.  Does anyone have a third solution?

Michael J. Sabal
mjs at osa.att.ne.jp
http://home.att.ne.jp/gold/mjs/index.html

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu