Re: 3rd or 4th generation lang (was Associative vs Analytical)
- Posted by Hawke <mdeland at NWINFO.NET> Aug 04, 1998
- 603 views
Irv wrote: > I also tried Prograph, which, in my opinion rates 100 in concept, and around > 30 in implementation, with a score of -30 in user friendliness. i might possibly agree to those scores but i haven't actually had time to DL the windemo yet. be that as it may, my goal would be 80's or <dream> 90's </dream> on all those above scores for "iconophoria" (see other posts) > Now, I am no great programmer, but a simple program that I have written in > half a dozen different languages proved impossible to write - ( create ?) - > in Prograph. I quickly gave up trying, and hit the Delete key. again, very high priority on what i wish to create is utter simplicity and definitive ease, be it 1K prog's or 1000000K prog's... size *ahem* shouldn't matter :) > As for a language that meets your definition - give it a problem and it > figures out how to solve it - I think that is more like 8th generation. gimme! pwease?!?!? pwetty pwease? --Hawke' (please, not to nitpick, it's Hawke', not Hawk. my real name is mike, yes. Hawke' is a given name of sentimental value to me, given to me upon my rebirth... a subject i won't digress to on this list, offtopic and all that...</departs_pedestal>)