Re: 1 pass? - Reply
I am maybe the last one you expect this from, but Jiri does have a point.
You should be able to write a program in a way most logical for that
particular program.
I myself too have had the experience that due to this forced upon order Im
actually ordening things less logically. There isnt always an obvious range
order of routines.
>>Anyone who wants to call routines before he writes them should also
>>run them before he writes them. That way he will know about any future
>>errors, and can avoid writing them in the first place.
>
>That's very clever, Irv. I bet you stole it. Jiri
This on the other hand does not counter his argument not mention the effect
it may well have.
But also for those into OO. It is a lot more easier without this restriction
that it is with this restriction. Not that im not using routine pointers,
but the routine uses constants declared together with the rest of the
object. However the declaration of the rest of the object includes storing
the routine pointer of the routine. See the problem ? You need to seperate
that part of declaration and put it on top, thereby creating immense complex
to read programs, that are a bitch to debug. Any1 trying my OOP library will
have experienced the same pain.
Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen
nieuwen at xs4all.nl
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
