Re: What's holding Euphoria back ?
>
>You gave me a idea....If some one(i dont think me) could port the
>netscape browser to E and then make a new pulg in type(just a E file
>that can call and work with and in the browser)
I'd thought about the role of Euphora as a replacement for Java; it
would certainly be a lot easier to use, however, the problem of take-up
would occur; I haven't even got ShockWave installed and a lot of people
might be a little unhappy about having to load the Euphoria Engine just
to view a web page ( "Why can't they use Java, like everyone else ?" ).
That said, Euphoria would undoubtedly run a lot quicker than Java I'm
sure.
Rather than rewrite NS ( and then port it to all platforms Linux, Mac
etc ); why not concentrate on Plug-Ins for browsers ? I know it can be
done with IE at least.
I would seriously suggest not implementing a browser as the danger is
that MS will come up with some new fangled concept which you than have
to implement, which may be hard, Hmm, I wonder why MS do this ? 
DHTML is now a standard AFAIR but does anyone really think that will
stop MS creating its own variants ?
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
