Re: GOTOs: why so religiously?!
Tone =A9koda wrote:
>
> > Kat,
> > still wants "goto" in Eu, then she can "exit" out of any loop with th=
e one
> > command, to a properly well defined and easily read local target.
>
> yes, this is real problem, because you have to add flags and check them
> every time. (Goto's really aren't that bad as I said once.)
>..
I hope we are not trying to avoid 4 letter words in principle here. I
don't understand it anymore: why not introducing a GOTO and a LABEL:,
restricted to modules, functions, and procedures, but no jumps into
functions or procedures or loops or 'if' statements!
I requested this a long time ago, although one don't need it in
principle, but in special cases life with GOTOs in Euphoria would be
more practical.
By the way: people who believe in the right way of 'structured
programming': also structured programs, especially without GOTOs, could
be almost unreadable, your are not save without a GOTO, but it could be
cleaner (and easier) with a GOTO!
Be practical: if it's easier and cleaner: use a GOTO!
I apply for it, 'goto' and 'label:'.
Have a nice day (and excuse my bad English), Rolf Schroeder
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
