Re: What's holding Euphoria back ?
- Posted by Raude Riwal <rauder at THMULTI.COM> Feb 05, 1999
- 478 views
I understand for E . and occasionally agree. But why "++" ? does it mean classes,methods,...and structures ? Oh, not again... ...maybe E** (it's not beautiful) Seriously, how do you feel the name Euphoria? Here in france, we don't matter with names, because they almost *never* mean anything. fortran? pascal? C? algol? lisp? that are just letters put together. The difference is the reputation : some languages are *known* to be serious. Euphoria is greek, like many scientific or technical stuff; the meaning suggests it's fun (isn't it?); it sounds more or less like Eudora, which is well-known. If the name makes people laugh: it's the right name. Don't name it Lachrimae. ---------- From: Bown, John To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU Subject: What's holding Euphoria back ? Date: Thursday 4 February 1999 19:13 It was suggested [ apologies to whoever as I don't have the original ] that the name Euphoria is one of the problems, not sounding serious enough. There is one, and only one, way to give Euphoria credibility in the current world of computer science, rename version 2.1 to ... E++ <<hugely wide grin>>