OpenEuphoria

Re: What's holding Euphoria back ?

• Posted by C & K L <candkNOSPAM2ME at TICNET.COM> Feb 04, 1999
• 465 views

I think an 'E' programming language already exists...

"Boehme, Gabriel" wrote:

> "Bown, John" <John.Bown at UK.ORIGIN-IT.COM> wrote:
>
> >It was suggested [ apologies to whoever as I don't have the original ]
> >that the name Euphoria is one of the problems, not sounding serious
> >enough.
> >
> >There is one, and only one, way to give Euphoria credibility in the
> >current world of computer science, rename version 2.1 to ...
> >
> >E++
> >
> ><<hugely wide grin>>
>
> <Gasp>!
>
> Actually, this is a really good idea. The anti-C crowd would have a fit, of
> course, but it's concise and spiffy-looking. "E++" also implies that it's
> more advanced than C++, which doesn't hurt, either.
>
> I wouldn't object to this at all.
>
> Gabriel Boehme