Re: data analysis
On 17 Jan 2001, at 0:55, Kat wrote:
> David and Graeme, all i can say is wow, and thanks. David's presentation
> of the data is going to be easier to use first, but in the following test,
> David's didn't resync properly, and i think cause it is it trying to resync
> always on s2. In Sweigsdunka vs Zweigsdanka, it sync'd and found "weigsd",
> but then didn't resync properly on the "nka". It took the first 'a' from
> Zweigsdanka and went looking for it in Sweigsdunka, not finding it untill the
> end of the word. It thereby missed the common "nka". Swaping the words around
> didn't help David's code's results at all, but messed up Graeme's code's
> results in a new way. Is it possible to force which word is the primary sync
> in your code, David, in a way i can spec while it's running? Mostly, i'd be
> looking for the result with the fewest number of differences. /me is still
> studying the code....
Changing MaxGap to 2 made it resync faster, but i'm not sure yet that
passing maxgap to diff() along with the words is the right answer yet..
Kat
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
