Re: Replacing GOTO. [was Re: Conceptual problem solved by GOTO]

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Matt Lewis wrote:
> 
> 
> But, yes, if we're going to have goto, I don't see the usefulness of
> the more limited approach you've given here.
> 
> Matt

Why do we need any constructs if we could do the same thing with goto?
Goto is low-level, it should not be a replacement for higher level constructs
which provide structure.

Chris Bensler
Code is Alchemy

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu