Re: w32feature()

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Arthur Crump wrote:
> 
> CChris wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > I don't expect to put this in win32lib v0.70.4a, but perhaps in 70..
> ...
> > I'm contemplting the addition of a w32feature(name) or
> > w32feature(name,state=on)
> > proedure that would act a little like a with/without directive in this
> > egard.
> ...
> > Any thoughts?
> > 
> > CChris
> 
> I would like to suggest w32feature(<version>,state=on)
> to include ALL the features of the specified version.
> 
> Arthur Crump

Interesting, but not quite practical.
If "feture" includes any new stuff, then you have a simpler way, which is to
keep the older version. If the scope is restricted to changes, welll that becomes
more feasible.
I don't think I'd go through the change log to rebuild all layers of change,
including from a recent date. Were you implying this?

CChris

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu