Re: Conceptual problem solved by GOTO
- Posted by Jeremy Cowgar <jeremy at cowg?r.?om> Jun 06, 2008
- 741 views
ken mortenson wrote: > > I keep seeing people make the same false claims about GOTO over and over. > > The issue regarding GOTO vs. structured code IS NOT SPEED. Yes, calling a > routine to refactor code makes the refactored code slower... but you NEVER > have to call a sub routine. The tradeoff without using functions is SIZE > not SPEED. > I think speed has been emphasized so much because people are demanding reasons why to add goto and are rejecting any possibility of it ever making sense that goto may in some situations be easier to read/use/maintain. -- Jeremy Cowgar http://jeremy.cowgar.com