OpenEuphoria

Re: Alternate .so for wxEuphoria

• Posted by Mario Steele <eumario at trilake.net> May 01, 2005
• 436 views

Robert Craig wrote:
> I have a fairly new, 2.66 GHz Intel CPU with 512 MB RAM.
> I don't think the details of the CPU could affect whether
> a library will load or not.

Actually, with a compiler, and the CPU, it does matter, cause certian
functions that can be optimized for certian CPU's, it will be, and it'll
cause the library not load on older CPUs.  Same applies for Executables.

> I don't know. Aren't you loading the same libraries that Matt does?
> His version of wxeu.so works fine (interpreted).

I don't know what configure options Matt is using for his compile of
wxeu.so, so I'm using the default ones.

> Isn't there a Linux command to track which libraries are
> loading, or failing to load? I think with gdb you can do it, 
> if you recompile everything in debug mode.

Yes, this I am doing as we speak, it's ./configure --enable-debug_dbg, which
as soon as I confirm that it's compiled properly, I'll upload it for both you
and Ken to run through GDB, to see if we might figure out what is happening.

I suggest that Matt does the same with his compile, so that we may get a
better idea of where it's crashing, with his compile.  If we can keep to 1
compile, it'll be easier to maintain, instead of multiple compiles.  But
if it comes to needing multiple compiles, Matt has allready said that he 
would be willing to do that.

Mario Steele
http://enchantedblade.trilake.net
Attaining World Dominiation, one byte at a time...