OpenEuphoria

Re: New DOS-Interpretable formats...

• Posted by Patrick Quist <quistnet at HOTMAIL.COM> Jul 30, 2000
• 397 views

Hy,

Yeah, I also thought about the ID's of the variables and
at first I had only 26x26 combinations {'A'-'Z','A'-'Z'}.
I replaced that with 1Byte which can hold Id's of 256 variables
and is a lot easier to interpret and faster.
I don't think anyone uses more than 256 vars which can be
Integers and 1D-Sequences. Anymore than 256 Procedures would
also be absolete, right?

I'm glad someone understood it.

Thanks,
PQ

>From: Caballero Rojo <pampeano at ROCKETMAIL.COM>
>Reply-To: Caballero Rojo <pampeano at rocketmail.com>
>To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU
>Subject: Re: New DOS-Interpretable formats...
>Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 02:45:03 -0300
>
>Hello Patrick,
>       Suppose that you write the ID of a var in ASCII, you can only
>       have ten vars.. or if you write it like a byte (HEX) you can
>       only have 255 (FF) and this can happen with all the routines
>       with numbers that you only give a 1 byte length
>
>--
>Best regards,                            ICQ Number: 3198249
>  Caballero Rojo                          mailto:pampeano at rocketmail.com
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com