Re: Compiler status
Ralf wrote:
> Or just kick the annoying Watcom graphics library out of the
> executable ...
What's so annoying about it? It's pretty basic, it reflects its age,
but it is quite fast and reliable, what else do you want?
As usual, Ralf rambled on:
> ... Find a way to incorporate Neil.e (renamed to graphics.e ? ) ...
Don't. When Neil works, it works well. When it doesn't, it doesn't.
For instance, it never worked with any NT machine I tried it on.
What's more, last time I looked, it lacked essential primitives like
line, ellipse, polygon, etc. No doubt it can be made more complete,
but as it stands now, it's a desirable extension, but definitely not a
suitable replacement.
jiri
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
