RE: Looking for the best "JOIN"
- Posted by Andy Drummond <kestrelandy at xalt.co.uk> Oct 22, 2001
- 385 views
Whoops! I was trying to say, try this: function join (sequence strings) sequence result result = "" for i=1 to length(strings) result = result & strings[i] end for return result end function I just wrote exactly that and it seems perfectly satisfactory. So what have I missed that's so obvious to y'all out there? Derek Parnell wrote: > Unsaid in Euman request, but assumed by others is the desire to find a > method of joining an abitary number of strings. The exact number would > not > be known until run-time. > > If we were to take Euman's request a face value the answer might be ... > > > function join() > return "str1str2str3" > end function > > because that is literally what he asked for, 'Heres what I want: > "str1str2str3"'. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andy Drummond" <kestrelandy at xalt.co.uk> > To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:54 PM > Subject: RE: Looking for the best "JOIN" > > > > Have I missed something? > > Surely this is built in to Euphoria as a fundamental? > > > > sequence x > > > > x = "abc"&"def"&"ghijk" > > > > ... and d then = "abcdefghijk" > > > > I just tried it and it does ... so? > > > > Andy > > > > > > euman at bellsouth.net wrote: > > > Im looking for the best JOIN method. > > > > > > Heres what I have: {"str1","str2","str3"} > > > > > > Heres what I want: "str1str2str3" > > > > > > No slow ideas please>>>> > > > > > > Euman > > > euman at bellsouth.net > > > > > >