Re: LCCWIN ver WATCOM, BORLAND and interpreter
- Posted by euman at bellsouth.net Oct 20, 2001
- 410 views
Look at that, now this is worded wrong too.........> I need a break. I must be thinking to hard o,r not at all. Most likely it's the ladder part. Euman euman at bellsouth.net > > it didn't catch it because it's perfectly legal > > True, I dont dispute this. I do think and was hinting that maybe free( ) > should have > a check associated that would send a red flag up telling you about > pre-existing > allocated adresses with the same name. > > Euman > euman at bellsouth.net