Re: LCCWIN ver WATCOM, BORLAND and interpreter

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Look at that, now this is worded wrong too.........> I need a break.
I must be thinking to hard o,r not at all.

Most likely it's the ladder part.

Euman
euman at bellsouth.net

> > it didn't catch it because it's perfectly legal
> 
> True, I dont dispute this. I do think and was hinting that maybe free( )
> should have
> a check associated that would send a red flag up telling you about
> pre-existing
> allocated adresses with the same name.
> 
> Euman
> euman at bellsouth.net

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu