Re: Best Compression Include File
- Posted by Mike Nelson <MichaelANelson at WORLDNET.ATT.NET> Oct 18, 2001
- 406 views
Ck, I use both win 2K and win 98 at work and 2K takes longer to read and write floppies in all cases--and the longer the write would be in 98, the bigger the difference. -- Mike Nelson ----- Original Message ----- From: "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Subject: Best Compression Include File > > There seems to be a huge performance difference of Junko's huffman > compression code on Win2K vs. use on Win9x. When I run it on Win2K for > output to the floppy drive, it requires about 1.5 to twice as much time to > complete when running on Win2K! > > What's the time profiling command? Maybe I should try that. > > Can anybody discern what might be the cause and the fix? > > Thanks, > ck > > >