OpenEuphoria

Re: Best Compression Include File

• Posted by Mike Nelson <MichaelANelson at WORLDNET.ATT.NET> Oct 18, 2001
• 406 views

Ck,

I use both win 2K and win 98 at work and 2K takes longer to read and write
floppies in all cases--and the longer the write would be in 98, the bigger
the difference.

-- Mike Nelson
----- Original Message -----
From: "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Best Compression Include File


>
> There seems to be a huge performance difference of Junko's huffman
> compression code on Win2K vs. use on Win9x. When I run it on Win2K for
> output to the floppy drive, it requires about 1.5 to twice as much time to
> complete when running on Win2K!
>
> What's the time profiling command? Maybe I should try that.
>
> Can anybody discern what might be the cause and the fix?
>
> Thanks,
> ck
>
>
>