Re: Army Composition

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

C..K.,

Would this be a "real-time" recalc of number of tiers?

That is, in either the beginning or course of use of your program, would
there be a query (or other opportunity to set):  "how many tiers of managers
do you want?", or would this be a pre-set for each application?

Dan


----- Original Message -----
From: "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:32 PM
Subject: RE: Army Composition


>
> Hey, Dan, thanks for the help. All truth will soon be revealed.
>
> > The number "10556" was  calculated by simple algebra:
> >
> > --Soldiers - no requirements
> > --Squad Leader - commands 20 soldiers
> > --Lt. - commands 10 Squad Leaders
> > --Captain - commands 10 Lt.s
> > --General - commands 5 Captains
> >
> >
> > -- soldiers + squad leaders + Lts. + Captains + Generals = Population
> > (army!)
> > --s + (s/20) + ((s/20)/10) + (((s/20)/10)/10 ) + ((((s/20)/10)/10)/5)= P
> > -- s + s/20  +  s/200 +  s/2000  + s/10000 = p
> > -- 10000s + 500s + 50s + 5s + s = 10000p
> > -- 10556s = 10000p
> > -- s = 1000p/10556
> >
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean by "4 levels and 6 levels" of rank.
You
> > only specified 5 levels of rank.
>
> Right. But "What If" I needed to calculate for a differently leveled
> organization? What if my calculations required a 4-tier organization or a
> 6-tier organization, other than the 5-tier organization we've hard coded
so
> far...?
>
> What if we had { "Soldier" , "Leader" , "Captain" , "General" }?
>
> > If you want to find out how many different ranks there are, just look at
> > each rank var, if not zero, increment a "NumberOfRanks" counter.
>
> Yeah. That's what I mean. But how to implement? That's what I need to
know.
>
> > I didn't really understand what you're doing with the matrix, either,
and
> > the change in your rank system,
> > ranks = { "Soldier" , "Leader" , "Captain" , "Sergeant" , "General" }
> > seems wrong, it should be:
> > ranks = { "Soldier" , "Leader" , "Sergeant" ,"Captain"  , "General" }
>
> Okay! Sounds right to me. But anything would.
>
> I'm just using familiar labels. We could also be using
>
> { "Pion" , "Assistant Manager" , "Manager" , "VP" , "President" }
>
> or something similar. The labels aren't what's important... It's the
tiered
> organization that matters.
>
> Hopefully I've shed a little light on the above.
>
> -ck

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu