Re: New feature request: file extensions
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Apr 02, 2007
- 472 views
Matt Lewis wrote: <snip> > Proposed order of precedence: > > exw.exe: > 1) .exw > 2) .exu > 3) .ex <snip> Hmmm... OK, the exw/exu is valid for wxEuphoria, but ex? Only the most trivial programs work on both ex.exe and exw.exe. "Point 3" is therefore not getting my vote, maybe though: <pre> C:\> exw fred Cannot open fred.exw. However the file fred.ex exists, perhaps you meant ex fred? </pre> might help avoid some newbie confusion. Just the blunt message, I am not advocating that exw.exe offers to 'system("ex fred")', you understand. Regards, Pete