OpenEuphoria

Re: goto

• Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Jan 07, 2001
• 430 views

On 7 Jan 2001, at 9:40, Jack Cat wrote:

> Kat wrote:
> > The return tells me you have it in a subroutine all
> > it's own, and with it
> > calling overhead of the procedure or function.
> >
> > Kat
>
>
>
> Now hold it missy...
> A procedure wich doesn't take any parameters has
> EXACTLY as much overhead as a goto, or jump.
> Use that instead.
>
> procedure jump()
> end procedure
>
> And that's all you need. No parameters have to be
> pushed onto the stack, and no return value has to be
> created.

Well, that still doesn't speak *against* the use of a goto.
 

Kat