Re: Fermat extended - Only for mathemathicians
- Posted by encephalon1 at msn.com
Aug 15, 2002
------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C244B5.695DF5D0
I am slightly confused.. is this "extended conjecture" something that Fer=
mat himself brought into awareness, or is it an idea of your own that ste=
ms from Fermat's Last theorem???? And if it is.. why not call it "rforno=
's theorem?" Maybe I missed something in an earlier post.. what conjectu=
re are you discussing here?
----- Original Message -----
From: rforno at tutopia.com
Subject: RE: Fermat extended - Only for mathemathicians
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =20
OK, James, but do you have any information about the "extended conjecture=
"
I
am posing? It is a generalisation of Last Fermat's Theorem. I do not have
the mathematical abilities to try to solve it, so I only tried to find a
counterexample with my program, knowing that if it finds one, the
"Extended
Fermat=B4s Conjecture" will be disproved.
Regards.
----- Original Message -----
From: <munchr at mac.com>
To: EUforum <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 2:10 AM
Subject: RE: Fermat extended - Only for mathemathicians
>
> Andrew Wiles solved Fermat's Last Theorem. His first solution,
announced
> on June 23, 1993 at the Isaac Newton College, in Cambridge, was found t=
o
> be flawed. He was able to fix it though, and in 1995 his accepted proo=
f
was
> published in the Annals of Mathematics, titled "Modular elliptic curves
and
> Fermat's Last Theorem".
>
> Suggested reading, for those who are interested can be found at:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&lr=3D&ie=3DISO-8859-1&q=3Dandrew+w=
iles
>
> http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=3Dnavclient&q=3Dfermat+last+theor=
em
>
> Also, check out the book "Fermat's Last Theorem" by Simon Singh, which
> details Andrew Wiles achievement, as well as the many attempts by other=
s
> to prove the theorem. It can be found at
http://www.simonsingh.com/fermat.htm
>
> James Powell
>
> >Apparently you did not read the caption at the top of the program, or
my
> >English is very bad.
> >I know that this program cannot prove the conjecture to be true, but i=
t
can
> >prove it to be false.
> >Moreover, I was interested in knowing if someone posed the same
conjecture
> >that I call "extended Fermat theorem".
> >About the original conjecture, I remember having heard that someone
finally
> >proved it to be true, not by means of a computer program but using
advanced
> >math theory.
>
>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
This email was sent to: encephalon1 at msn.com
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3DGet more from the Web.=
FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C244B5.695DF5D0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><BODY STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;"><DIV> </DIV> <=
DIV>I am slightly confused.. is this "extended conjecture" something that=
Fermat himself brought into awareness, or is it an idea of your own that=
stems from Fermat's Last theorem???? And if it is.. why not call i=
t "rforno's theorem?" Maybe I missed something in an earlier post..=
what conjecture are you discussing here?</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADD=
ING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000=
2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Ori=
ginal Message -----</DIV> <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt A=
rial; COLOR: black"><B>From:</B> rforno at tutopia.com</DIV> <DIV style=3D"F=
ONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:28 PM</DIV> <D=
IV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>To:</B> EUforum</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT=
: 10pt Arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Fermat extended - Only for mathemathici=
ans</DIV> <DIV> </DIV>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The Eupho=
ria Mailing List =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D <BR><BR>OK, James, =
but do you have any information about the "extended conjecture"<BR>I<BR>a=
m posing? It is a generalisation of Last Fermat's Theorem. I do not have<=
BR>the mathematical abilities to try to solve it, so I only tried to find=
a<BR>counterexample with my program, knowing that if it finds one, the<B=
R>"Extended<BR>Fermat=B4s Conjecture" will be disproved.<BR>Regards.<BR>-=
---- Original Message -----<BR>From: <munchr at mac.com><BR>To: EUforu=
m <EUforum at topica.com><BR>Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 2:10 AM<B=
R>Subject: RE: Fermat extended - Only for mathemathicians<BR><BR><BR>>=
<BR>> Andrew Wiles solved Fermat's Last Theorem. His first solut=
ion,<BR>announced<BR>> on June 23, 1993 at the Isaac Newton College, i=
n Cambridge, was found to<BR>> be flawed. He was able to fix it =
though, and in 1995 his accepted proof<BR>was<BR>> published in the An=
nals of Mathematics, titled "Modular elliptic curves<BR>and<BR>> Ferma=
t's Last Theorem".<BR>><BR>> Suggested reading, for those who are i=
nterested can be found at:<BR>><BR>> http://www.google.com/search?h=
l=3Den&lr=3D&ie=3DISO-8859-1&q=3Dandrew+wiles<BR>><BR>>=
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=3Dnavclient&q=3Dfermat+last+th=
eorem<BR>><BR>> Also, check out the book "Fermat's Last Theorem" by=
Simon Singh, which<BR>> details Andrew Wiles achievement, as well as =
the many attempts by others<BR>> to prove the theorem. It can be=
found at<BR>http://www.simonsingh.com/fermat.htm<BR>><BR>> James P=
owell<BR>><BR>> >Apparently you did not read the caption at the =
top of the program, or<BR>my<BR>> >English is very bad.<BR>> >=
;I know that this program cannot prove the conjecture to be true, but it<=
BR>can<BR>> >prove it to be false.<BR>> >Moreover, I was inte=
rested in knowing if someone posed the same<BR>conjecture<BR>> >tha=
t I call "extended Fermat theorem".<BR>> >About the original conjec=
ture, I remember having heard that someone<BR>finally<BR>> >proved =
it to be true, not by means of a computer program but using<BR>advanced<B=
R>> >math theory.<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR><BR>=3D=3D^=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<BR>This email was sent to: enceph=
alon1 at msn.com<BR><BR>EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?b1=
dd66.b2PHWj<BR>Or send an email to: EUforum-unsubscribe at topica.com<BR><BR=
>T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!<BR>http://www.topica.co=
m/partner/tag02/register<BR>=3D=3D^=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
eb. FREE MSN Explorer download : <a href=3D'http://explorer.msn.com'>htt=
p://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p>
------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C244B5.695DF5D0--
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
