Re: Fermat extended - Only for mathemathicians
- Posted by encephalon1 at msn.com
Aug 15, 2002
------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C244AF.9A20ED90
hey.. that's the book I was speaking of =3D]
----- Original Message -----
From: munchr at mac.com
Subject: RE: Fermat extended - Only for mathemathicians
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =20
Andrew Wiles solved Fermat's Last Theorem. His first solution, announced
on June 23, 1993 at the Isaac Newton College, in Cambridge, was found to
be flawed. He was able to fix it though, and in 1995 his accepted proof =
was
published in the Annals of Mathematics, titled "Modular elliptic curves a=
nd
Fermat's Last Theorem".
Suggested reading, for those who are interested can be found at:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&lr=3D&ie=3DISO-8859-1&q=3Dandrew+wil=
es
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=3Dnavclient&q=3Dfermat+last+theorem
Also, check out the book "Fermat's Last Theorem" by Simon Singh, which
details Andrew Wiles achievement, as well as the many attempts by others
to prove the theorem. It can be found at http://www.simonsingh.com/ferma=
t.htm
James Powell
>Apparently you did not read the caption at the top of the program, or my
>English is very bad.
>I know that this program cannot prove the conjecture to be true, but it =
can
>prove it to be false.
>Moreover, I was interested in knowing if someone posed the same conjectu=
re
>that I call "extended Fermat theorem".
>About the original conjecture, I remember having heard that someone fina=
lly
>proved it to be true, not by means of a computer program but using advan=
ced
>math theory.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
This email was sent to: encephalon1 at msn.com
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3DGet more from the Web.=
FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C244AF.9A20ED90
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><BODY STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;"><DIV>hey.. that's t=
he book I was speaking of =3D]</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE
style=3D=
"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0=
00000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">----=
- Original Message -----</DIV> <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 1=
0pt Arial; COLOR: black"><B>From:</B> munchr at mac.com</DIV> <DIV style=3D"=
FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 15, 2002 1:13 AM</DIV> <D=
IV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>To:</B> EUforum</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT=
: 10pt Arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Fermat extended - Only for mathemathici=
ans</DIV> <DIV> </DIV>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The Eupho=
ria Mailing List =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D <BR><BR>Andrew Wile=
s solved Fermat's Last Theorem. His first solution, announced<BR>on=
June 23, 1993 at the Isaac Newton College, in Cambridge, was found to<BR=
>be flawed. He was able to fix it though, and in 1995 his accepted =
proof was<BR>published in the Annals of Mathematics, titled "Modular elli=
ptic curves and<BR>Fermat's Last Theorem".<BR><BR>Suggested reading, for =
those who are interested can be found at:<BR><BR>http://www.google.com/se=
arch?hl=3Den&lr=3D&ie=3DISO-8859-1&q=3Dandrew+wiles<BR><BR>ht=
tp://www.google.com/search?sourceid=3Dnavclient&q=3Dfermat+last+theor=
em<BR><BR>Also, check out the book "Fermat's Last Theorem" by Simon Singh=
, which<BR>details Andrew Wiles achievement, as well as the many attempts=
by others<BR>to prove the theorem. It can be found at http://www.s=
imonsingh.com/fermat.htm<BR><BR>James Powell<BR><BR>>Apparently you di=
d not read the caption at the top of the program, or my<BR>>English is=
very bad.<BR>>I know that this program cannot prove the conjecture to=
be true, but it can<BR>>prove it to be false.<BR>>Moreover, I was =
interested in knowing if someone posed the same conjecture<BR>>that I =
call "extended Fermat theorem".<BR>>About the original conjecture, I r=
emember having heard that someone finally<BR>>proved it to be true, no=
t by means of a computer program but using advanced<BR>>math theory.<B=
R><BR>=3D=3D^=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<BR>This email w=
as sent to: encephalon1 at msn.com<BR><BR>EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http:=
//topica.com/u/?b1dd66.b2PHWj<BR>Or send an email to: EUforum-unsubscribe=
@topica.com<BR><BR>T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!<BR>ht=
tp://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register<BR>=3D=3D^=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
et more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : <a href=3D'http://exp=
lorer.msn.com'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p>
------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C244AF.9A20ED90--
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
