Re: eu 4.0

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

irv mullins wrote:
> 
> Yes, actually about 11,000 warnings were being generated. Something 
> to do with the difference in the way includes are handled between 3.1 and 4.0.
> 
> I've fixed those in my eugtk code. 
>

Did that fix anything in regards to speed?

> There are still some 'interesting' developments. More on those later.

I hate to say this, but it's good you are doing this. It is giving us an
opportunity to see what a large project is going to do with 4.0. Euphoria has a
new wiki, it's not official yet, but I wonder if you would be so kind to add to a
wiki page I've created:

http://openeuphoria.org/wiki/euwiki.cgi?MigratingTo40

The reason it is not official yet is the parsing engine is a bit sensitive to
correct syntax. You can goof it up if you try, which should not be so. Soon I
will announce its official use, but while things are fresh in your mind, please
document the changes there if you do not mind.

That goes for everyone else as well. Thanks!

--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu