Re: goto: it's conceded

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

gshingles wrote:
> 
> ken mortenson wrote:
> > --8<--
> > This isn't the only problem related to GOTO's but it is perhaps the easiest
> > to perceive.
> 
> One word (or maybe two):
> 
> GOSUB

Well, that's terse.  Let me add a few more.  Back in the day, I thought I
could never live without ON X GOTO, as well as ON X GOSUB.  I have matured
quite a bit since then.  The idea of using any of these four today is
physically loathesome to me.  Not to offend, but for a HLL to include these
would make it a toy language not suitable for serious development. YMMV.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu