Re: goto: it's conceded
ken mortenson wrote:
>
> Jason Gade wrote:
> >
> > Kat wrote:
> > >
> > > I just conceded to Derek that i cannot defend every possible use of
> > > "goto",
> > > and i cannot support to his standards the use of "goto". We agreed i will
> > > not
> > > be ultimately happy with Euphoria in all regards, perhaps i not use
> > > Euphoria
> > > any more, and i suggested to JBrown he not see what it takes to add "goto"
> > > to
> > > Euphoria v4. Is there any other groveling i need do?
> > >
> > > Kat
> >
> > A disagreement or an unpopular stance doesn't mean you have to grovel to
> > anyone.
> > Stick to your beliefs.
>
> I agree with Jason.
I keep my beliefs. They just aren't wanted in Euphoria, #Euphoria, or Euforum.
You will get a lot of new keywords and functions in Eu v4, some of which were
thought up and considered for a few minutes before addition to the language. Goto
isn't one of the new keywords. You will probably get strtok.e, and i appologise
in advance for that, and any offence you take with eunet.e over any of my code
that may still be in it. I had a lot of hope pinned on Euphoria. I am too old to
start looking for a new language, i may just give up on all high level languages,
the entire wintel platform, and goto AVRs and the olde 6502. And not release any
code, so it cannot be called carp, and my ideas for the language not
automatically shot down as a matter of course.
Kat
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
