Re: Do you currently use namespaces?
Matt Lewis wrote:
> ken mortenson wrote:
> > Including fileA and fileB twice is only a little bit of nails on the
> > chalkboard for me, but I can get past that because the language allows it.
>
> It's not a matter of including it twice. His point was that your code should
> include what it needs. Your statement is actually the antithesis of modular
> programming, IMHO. Each module should explicitly declare its dependencies.
> Euphoria has never required this, though it will at least generate a
> warning in 4.0.
I was being a bit too flip here. I think I was getting a bit punchy from
responding to everybody. I really didn't expect it to be so controversial
when I say that includes don't encourage modular programming.
To me this is self evident. Apparently not to others. I did see his point.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
