Re: Do you currently use namespaces?
ken mortenson wrote:
>
> I hope everyone realizes that I'm not bashing Euphoria when I say
> it has features that make it less than ideal for modular programming.
>
No way. In order to make a programming language more useful you have to point
out it's weak spots. If you fail to find, talk about or suggest different methods
on it's weak spots, you might as well give up and trash what ever you are working
on.
> I love what Euphoria is and have a vision of what it could become.
Me too! You may be very interested in some of the discussion that will be coming
up on the exact topic you are addressing on the dev list. On the dev list we are
going to try to define the problem and come up with a few solutions, then present
the information we have found to EUforum.
From your work here on EUforum already, I think you would be a great help there
in the initial stages... Again, to everyone, the dev list is not for the elite,
it's for anyone to join... we are driven by the community but sometimes, in cases
like this, we don't even understand the problem fully so we try to talk about it
and figure out the problem before trying to post a message here solving a problem
we do not know about 
>
> I've been looking for a language that gives me the pure joy I sometimes
> experience when coding and Euphoria is one of the few that has such
> potential.
>
> Sadly, I've seen potential fail too often in my half century.
>
Good times are ahead for Euphoria. We are nearing completion on many fronts and
an alpha is not far away. After that, beta's and final 4.0 release.
--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
