Re: Do you currently use namespaces?
ken mortenson wrote:
>
> Never.
>
> Matt Lewis wrote:
> >How else would you have solved the problem?
>
> 1) An instance of a class does not have this problem.
>
> 2) DLL's may have functions with the same name which is resolved in
> the function call declaration by assigning an alias.
>
> Euphoria is not inherently modular because it uses the INCLUDE paradigm.
> Other languages use a project file paradigm.
I'm coming in late on this discussion, but how does include make it not modular?
For instance here is some of my code:
include user.e as user
include note.e as note
sequence notes
user:user current
current = user:get(1)
notes = note:get_all_for(current)
user.e is included in many different command line utilities/gui apps. It can be
used independent of any other. That's modular and using include?
>
> Most functions and variables should not be public and their scope should
> be limited to the file they are declared in.
>
Yes, that's just good practice and that's what I do above.
> Explicitly public functions and variables should have descriptive names
> which are less likely to conflict (but since even then they could, using
> classes would still be the solution.)
Yes, again, that's just good practice. I do not see how what you said is making
Euphoria not modular? Can you expand a bit?
--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
