OpenEuphoria

Re: scientific.e

• Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at ?ahoo.?om> May 22, 2008
• 718 views

Matt Lewis wrote:
> 
> Shawn Pringle wrote:
> > 
> > Matt Lewis and Jason Gade:
> > 
> > I don't think it is clear what is going on
> > to everyone here.  
> > The scientific_to_float64 probably expects a 
> > string of the form  (+-)d\.d\+e(+-)dd.
> 
> > I suggest you use a type for your function
> > for the sake of illistration let us suppose
> > there is a regex.e in the archive and a 
> > regex_match that does what perl's // operator
> > does.  Then the following is what you 
> > could use as a type.
> 
> Yes, I understood what you were saying.
> 
> > include regex.e
> > type scientific_string( sequence s )
> >    return regex_match( s, "(+-)\d\.\d\+e(+-)\d\d" )
> > end type
> 
> I think a correct regex would be (including capturing all of the interesting
> substrings):
> 
>   "(-?)(\\d+)(?:\\.(\\d+))?[eE][+\\-]?(\\d+)"
>  
> Matt

Sorry, I /hadn't/ understood. My reading comprehension skills seem to be lacking
a little lately.

My apologies.

As Matt pointed out in another post, this behavior is documented and I missed
it. The other numbers I passed the function were in the form "x.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
without an 'e' and those were parsed just fine.

--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple
system that works.
--John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics.

"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
--C.A.R. Hoare

j.