OpenEuphoria

Re: scientific.e

• Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at ya??o.com> May 22, 2008
• 719 views

Matt Lewis wrote:
> 
> Jason Gade wrote:
> > 
> > I was just pointing out a bug in Matt's scientific.e, which I was using to
> > try
> > and illustrate a different point. It's a case that should be handled by the
> > library or should be documented.
> 
> It is documented:
> 
> --/topic Scientific Notation
> --/func scientific_to_float64( sequence s )
> --
> --Takes a string reprepresentation of a number in scientific notation
> 
> --/topic Scientific Notation
> --/func scientific_to_atom( sequence s )
> --
> --Takes a string reprepresentation of a number in scientific notation
> 
> <a
> href="http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2008/05/05/8459022.aspx">http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2008/05/05/8459022.aspx</a>
> 
> Matt

Oh, sure, just assume that I've diligently read all of the documentation!

:P

(But thanks.)

--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple
system that works.
--John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics.

"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
--C.A.R. Hoare

j.