Re: scientific.e

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Jason Gade wrote:
> 
> I was just pointing out a bug in Matt's scientific.e, which I was using to try
> and illustrate a different point. It's a case that should be handled by the
> library or should be documented.

It is documented:

--/topic Scientific Notation
--/func scientific_to_float64( sequence s )
--
--Takes a string reprepresentation of a number in scientific notation

--/topic Scientific Notation
--/func scientific_to_atom( sequence s )
--
--Takes a string reprepresentation of a number in scientific notation

http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2008/05/05/8459022.aspx

Matt

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu