Re: Current implementation of exp() is faulty.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Right. And what I was trying to say was that converting from double to string to
double again loses information. Better to do one conversion and compare apples to
apples.

I think that CChris is talking about an arbitrary precision library. Doesn't one
of those already exist in the archive?

--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple
system that works.
--John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics.

"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
--C.A.R. Hoare

j.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu